A short introduction to Solar Photovoltaics energy generation
Related eBooks
Leave a Reply
Solar Panel & Windpower made easy
Solar DIY Wind Power – Green Power Easy Reviewed
Photovoltaic Solar Panels – homemade DIY energy
24 comments
No ping yet
geckologicusa says:
May 24, 2012 at 4:19 pm (UTC 0)
it will be standard procedure. Many Developers are now implementing solar panels on their suburban developments. It is all about the de-centralized “smart grid” 🙂
kricotas says:
May 24, 2012 at 5:17 pm (UTC 0)
thank you!
dee756 says:
May 24, 2012 at 5:22 pm (UTC 0)
when we got them i was very confused about how many etc, the easiest way to work out how many you’d need is when you receive your electricity bill somewhere on the bill it should show how many kW per day you are averaging out to using, this way it is easier to work out “at their top working rate” how many panels you would need! Say you use 20 – 28 kW per day , most panels are about 2. something, so you would need about 18 – 20 panels to get close to covering your bill!
xxxpole26xxx says:
May 24, 2012 at 5:51 pm (UTC 0)
Sukate qui!
wariorx1z says:
May 24, 2012 at 6:43 pm (UTC 0)
what the hell they need to start using this stuff if global warming is such a big deal
rebelliouseoagj says:
May 24, 2012 at 7:05 pm (UTC 0)
REAL Free energy technology exists!But the Establishment doesn’t want ppl to know this,Get the blueprints for a real Magnet motor free enegy machine at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Start the energy revolution!
mcgrueser says:
May 24, 2012 at 7:31 pm (UTC 0)
Very intuitive but didnt you notice that this was a video made for the uk….thought you would’ve picked up on that given your powers of observation!
kricotas says:
May 24, 2012 at 7:32 pm (UTC 0)
i did mesure with multimeter rates at
20.8 v !
UKSlimming says:
May 24, 2012 at 8:09 pm (UTC 0)
Hi Kricotas. I’m not familiar with the products you have but if your inverter is rated 1.5kW then you could go to about 20 x 85W solar modules (panels.) The suitability of your batteries depends on their collective capacity rather than their number.
kricotas says:
May 24, 2012 at 8:45 pm (UTC 0)
how is the calculations?
kricotas says:
May 24, 2012 at 9:25 pm (UTC 0)
hi!
question? i have bought 85 watts solar panel
im trying to intend to buy slowly solar panels i dont have that much money
i di buy sunforce charger Cont, ineverter 1500
18 bateries
how many solar panels i sould stil buy?
thank you
henrykay01 says:
May 24, 2012 at 9:46 pm (UTC 0)
I invented a breakthrough source of energy, which contradicts the law of conservation of energy. I have a PROOF that there are electrodynamic phenomena which contradict the law of energy conservation. It will cost about $1200 to make a 6 kW generator in mass production. Value of the energy produced yearly about $5400. I am looking for $300 000 for a prototype and for $3M for patents.
H. Tomasz Grzybowski
tel. +48-512-933-540
windymac says:
May 24, 2012 at 10:31 pm (UTC 0)
dzgfdg – You need to educate yourself before authorising on a subject. First read about feed in tariffs. Now get your calculator out. Deduct 12,500 from 25 x 850. That’s how much the householder with a 2.4kw system will make on the feed-in tariffs. Now you need to add to that the 20-40% saving on their electricity bills (that’s indefiniteiy by the way.) Add the fact that the value of their property increases by the cost of the installation. There are some idiots here and you’re one of them.
henrykay01 says:
May 24, 2012 at 11:09 pm (UTC 0)
I invented a breakthrough energy source which violates the law of energy conservation. I have a PROOF that there are electrodynamic phenomena violating the law of energy conservation. I am looking for $30000 for a prototype and for $3M for patents. In mass production it will cost $1200 to make a 15 kW generator, value of energy produced YEARLY about $10000.
H. Tomasz Grzybowski
tel. +48-512-933-540
youtubasoarus says:
May 24, 2012 at 11:44 pm (UTC 0)
— The problem is profit and conflicting interests in what is profitable. If everyone was using solar power from the sun, nobody would pay energy companies, who make billions, if not trillions of dollars per year.
pc4nae says:
May 25, 2012 at 12:02 am (UTC 0)
Every hour enough energy reaches the earth for to meet the need for one year?
Yet in a video titled “How Photovoltaic Solar Cells Work”, they state every minute enough energy reaches earth to meet the need for one year. So which is it, you can’t both be right. Maybe neither of you are right? I don’t know who to believe these days….maybe I’ll just make up my own reality…
altagolfer says:
May 25, 2012 at 12:21 am (UTC 0)
My question is – what if a hail storm were to damage the panels? Who would replace them, and at who’s expense?
pacificcresttrans says:
May 25, 2012 at 1:17 am (UTC 0)
In the past 20 years, the demand for solar energy for domestic energy purposes has grown by up to 25% per year. With energy costs constantly increasing, governments are looking to solar energy as a more viable option to meet a growing need for energy. Pacific Crest Transformers has more information on this. You can also read whitepapers and articles on alternate energy at the Pacific Crest Transformers website
Sinncrow says:
May 25, 2012 at 2:15 am (UTC 0)
Really good video
MrEnergyCzar says:
May 25, 2012 at 2:58 am (UTC 0)
Great video…I converted my home to a net-zero solar powered home that uses no oil or gas…I made a video about it called, “Preparing for Peak Oil”….
henrykay01 says:
May 25, 2012 at 3:09 am (UTC 0)
I invented a breakthrough source of energy that contradicts the law of conservation of energy. I have a PROOF that there are electrodynamic phenomena that contradict the law of conservation of energy. I am looking for $6M for a prototype and patents.
H. Tomasz Grzybowski
tel. +48-512-933-540
robz40 says:
May 25, 2012 at 3:48 am (UTC 0)
You a few good points but the subject is rather vast to be discussed just with a few lines but keep this in mind. Solar and wind energy are unreliable therefore they need the grid and conventional or nuclear power anyway to back them up. These renewables DO NOT add power to the system, they only save a bit of fuel.
For example 40-60bln$ on PV lasting 30 years (and they don’t) only allow to save 30×0.01x7bln=2bln$ in nuke fuel + installing the nuke power station anyway. 40-2=38=bad deal
djbrian24 says:
May 25, 2012 at 4:39 am (UTC 0)
You’re exactly right, but tax incentives are a way of life. Why should my federal tax dollars pay for a TSA employee at an airport in Idaho when I live in Alabama? The previous solar slump is a thing of the past. As we continue our dependence on foreign energy, rather than capitalize on a huge opportunity to become the leading exporting nation of solar and other forms of alternative energy, we’ll continue to slip further into debt and become vulnerable to attacks, in more ways than one.
robz40 says:
May 25, 2012 at 5:20 am (UTC 0)
If it makes sense you are welcome to install them but remember: subsidies distort the real market and pass the costs on someone else and I can provide you with real data where PV became obsolete after 9 years. Warranties are only worth the duration of the company that can honour them.